Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote:
Right now, mixins are defined and used as:
template foo(T) { declarations... }
mixin foo!(int) handle;
The proposal is to switch it around:
mixin template foo(T) { declarations... }
foo!(int) handle;
to follow the notion that mixin templates are very different from
regular templates, and that should be reflected in their definition
rather than use.
What consensus was reached here? I see that instantiating mixin
templates without the mixin prefix does not work. Will it in the
future?
--
Simen
