On 07.07.2010 0:35, bearophile wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky:
template staticMap(alias F,T...){
static if(T.length> 1){
alias TypeTuple!(F!(T[0]),staticMap!(F,T[1..$])) staticMap;
}else{
alias TypeTuple!(F!(T[0])) staticMap;
}
}
It's better if you add some spaces to improve readability, and generally a map has to
work on an empty collection too. "The Little Schemer" book shows that it's
often better to base recursivity on zero or empty or the thing that represents nothing
(untested):
Sure thing, my codestyle is lacking spaces - all that fancy template
constructs are rather cryptic in C+, looks like I'm grown used to poorly
readable constructs.
template staticMap(alias F, T...) {
static if (T.length)
alias TypeTuple!(F!(T[0]), staticMap!(F, T[1 .. $])) staticMap;
else
alias TypeTuple!() staticMap;
}
Bye,
bearophile
Thanks, that stuff works. An idea of working with empty typetuples never
crossed my mind, but that, of course, should be covered.
---
Dmitry Olshansky
