> > > > 3. If I do end up writing my own or porting, is there sufficient interest >> in >> this that I should try to target it for std.numerics, or would I be better >> off >> just making it good enough for my use case? >> > > I think that a basic power-of-2 FFT is simple enough, and sufficiently > widely used to be worth including. >
You have my vote, David. As long as it does 2D FFT, it'll cover the vast majority of my own needs. And FFT is exactly the kind of things I need regularly, but only a few times a year. Having it in std.numerics would be excellent. Philippe
