Don wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Am not sure about 1441 and I don't think 2529 is just an
implementation issue.
2529 is an implementation issue (and I don't agree with Don, I think
his suggestion breaks encapsulation).
Maybe it does. I think the bug should be closed as invalid, because the
initial suggestion in the bug report is completely wrong: it would drive
you to put low-level stuff in the root, and derived stuff in the leaves.
Implementing that suggestion would encourage poor design.
Please add this as a comment to the entry.
I believe D's current approach is what Java does?
I'm not sure what Java does.
