Trass3r wrote:
Well isn't it natural that a constness system has a much larger impact than just some syntax additions. I don't see any flaws in its design. The implementation is of course still buggy though and needs to mature.
I agree. There are very severe bugs and undue limitations in today's const. Having a comprehensive discussion of const's status and role in current and future D idioms is a great idea. We should start it with a scrutiny of the reported and possibly unreported bugs in the feature.
Andrei
