If they were clever they wouldn't target an audience of programmers. :)
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Stanislav Blinov <[email protected]> wrote: > user wrote: >>> >>> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the >>> compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it >>> easier to search for them. These bugs have high priority. >> >>> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the >>> compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it >>> easier to search for them. These bugs have high priority. >> >> Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail >> at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be more >> honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations but its >> still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about another >> language which is so much work in progress after 10 years of development. >> They are all so stable. If I want I can build a 'E' language and fix all >> your legacy bugs. D is nowhere near perfection. The bug #1 in your bugzilla >> was 'just give up already'. Someone marked it wontfix. > > Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever? >
