"Danny Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:op.vi4emf1skxp...@zenix... > Op Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:33:37 +0200 schreef Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]>: > >> But you do raise a good point. What's the current state of ddmd's >> front-end? >> What I have in mind is to just rip out dmd's current backend stuff >> entirely, >> maybe even including the toObjFile and toIR methods, or at least big >> chunks >> of them, and replace it all with a PHP-generator. (Yea...I'm fairly >> determined to be able to do as much of my web dev as possible in D.) > > What?! No haxe output? I would love D -> Haxe...
I actually thought about that, but it seemed like an excess step, and I figured I could leverage my experience creating D->PHP to then do a D->Flash and maybe then D->JS...but...maybe it would be good to start with D->Haxe just to take care of all of them at once, and only then go about eliminating the extra step. What do other people think? If you're interested in D->PHP, or D->Flash, would you have any problem using Haxe as an intermediate step? Do you anticipate other potential users would have a problem with that?
