On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:57:44 +0000, retard wrote: > Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:53:41 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:39:19 -0400, retard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:02:56 +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:36, Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "retard" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>> > Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:32:16 +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:07, Lars T. Kyllingstad >>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> > As for this particular bug: thanks Walter! >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > Philippe >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Actually, Johannes deserves your thanks for this one -- he wrote >>>>> >>> the patch. :) >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> I heartily thank Johannes. >>>>> >> <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:07, Lars T. >>>>> >> Kyllingstad <span >>>>> >> dir="ltr"><[email protected]></span> >>>>> >> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 >>>>> >> .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div >>>>> >> class="im">> As for this particular bug: thanks >>>>> >> Walter!</div><div class="im"> ><br> > Philippe<br> >>>>> >> <br> >>>>> >> <br> >>>>> >> </div>Actually, Johannes deserves your thanks for this one -- he >>>>> >> wrote the<br> patch. :)<br><font class="Apple-style-span" >>>>> >> color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I >>>>> >> heartily thank Johannes. </div></div> >>>>> > >>>>> > You should stop using that html mumbo jumbo. Proper news readers >>>>> > can't handle it. >>>>> >>>>> I use Outlook Express with HTML turned off, and it came out fine for >>>>> me. I didn't see any of those tags. What reader are you using? >>> >>> I'm using Pan. This has worked just fine so far. Don't know what's >>> causing this now. >> >> When I first switched over to Linux, I used Pan, but IIRC, the ordering >> was too difficult to deal with. There were some other issues, but I >> can't remember what they were now. >> >> Opera is definitely the best one I've tried on Linux. >> >> -Steve > > Pan is more lightweight. Yes, I have a Core i7 with 24 GB of RAM, but am > still using the same desktop applications I had 10 years ago. If the > html garbage doesn't bother anyone else, I might as well shut up. Just > mentioned - thought there might be a simple fix.
I also use Pan and I see that html garbage as well. Hopefully not too many will switch to that combined format. BTW. Pan is the only option for me on netbook. Cheers Piotrek
