Peter Alexander: > Out of curiosity, what syntax did you propose?
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=73868 > That said, the current D way of writing it isn't all that different from > Python: > > return reduce!("a+b")(map!("a*a")(sequence), 0); That's many times worse than the Python syntax. Array/range comprehensions are syntax sugar, their point is to give something clean and readable that helps chunking: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunking_%28psychology%29 Bye, bearophile
