Reading these boards, both new and old posts, i hardly find any topic that i disagree with you.
This one is one of those rare cases.

It is really hard for me to connect "operator usage" and "operation complexity". To me, operators are just "cute", and mostly meaningful (and not necessarily) shortcuts. You can overload any operator, doesn't matter what it says/feels, you can do pretty much anything you like, on any complexity level.

Either purge it (you get Java) or lift the restrictions and let coder have it.

Thanks.


Language libraries are special and naturally care needs to be taken, you would need strong guaranties for pretty much anything in Phobos.

You can just use some other function, as a reference library, by doing that you also discourage its usage on things that require strong guaranties.

Thanks.

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Reply via email to