On 10/11/2010 08:02 PM, bearophile wrote:
You may implement a generic std.algorithm.join, and then implement the
std.string.join that uses just strings (the second argument may be a single
char too) and calls std.algorithm.join for its implementation.
If you don't like that name collision, the std.algorithm one may be named
joinRange or something else.
This is not a matter of name collision. The new join should be a
backward-compatible generalization of the existing one, so it should
just work for existing calls.
Andrei
