On 13/10/2010 2:41 AM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Justin Johansson <[email protected]> wrote:
The answer to the OP's question is simple: null's type is not
expressible in D.
That is a sad observation for a language that purports
maturity beyond the epoch of C/C++/Java et. al.
I'm curious - why does null need such a specific type?
I'm sure others can throw their thoughts in on this, however
for me, on the other side of the world, it is way beyond
the witching hour and I need to retire at least a few
hours before the sun rises.
Until later, enjoy your daylight time,
Justin
