Andrei Alexandrescu, el 16 de octubre a las 08:54 me escribiste: > On 10/16/10 1:35 CDT, Leandro Lucarella wrote: > >Kagamin, el 15 de octubre a las 17:16 me escribiste: > >>Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > >> > >>>I was talking to Walter about Kenji's adaptTo. We both think it's a very > >>>powerful enabler, but adaptTo is a bland name. After discussing a few > >>>marketing strategies, I proposed "duck". It's short, simple, and evokes > >>>"duck typing". > >> > >>1. adaptTo helped me to understand what it does, while duck!Drawable > >>doesn't. > > > >I agree, just "adapt" might be an option, it even has a precedence of > >something similar in Python (even when the PEP[1] was rejected, PEAK has > >an implementation[2]). But "duck" is really cryptic (as symbol names > >invented by Andrei usually are :). > > Walter recognized it instantly, as I think most should. Isn't "duck > typing" really spread out there?
Walter and you have the same convoluted brain, I can understand why he instantly recognize it ;) I already made my point, it make no sense to keep defending my position since, evidently, is a pure subjective matter. I just think auto a_bird = duck!Bird(a_duck) is not obvious at all compared to auto a_bird = adapt!Bird(a_duck). I even think adaptTo is even cleaner, and I tend to hate long names, specially when camelCase is involved, but since you didn't like it I, as others, suggested simply adapt). If one could write auto a_bird = adapt!a_duck(Bird), adapt would be as clear as adaptTo is with the current syntax. With adaptTo!Type you even have the precedent of the to!Type template, so it seems like a nice extension. F*ck, I finally kept defending my position... -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Si ella es la flor, yo soy la espina Si ella es quien florece, yo quien se marchita Y estamos en eclipse total, y estamos en eclipse total Completamente cruzados, completamente cruzados
