On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:22:46 +0400, Steven Wawryk <[email protected]>
wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Steven Wawryk ([email protected])'s article
C and C++ qualify. I'm new to D and still learning about it, but with
the deprecation of scoped classes and delete, I'm not sure that D
qualifies.
Why? The elimination of scope and delete just serves to uglyify the
relevant
concepts (which are unsafe and infrequently used) and save keywords.
The concepts
can still be expressed:
scope T -> std.typecons.scoped!T
Good - ugly is better than nothing. Can this be used for class members
of struct's too?
delete foo -> foo.__dtor(); GC.free(cast(void*) foo);
If I wrote my own minimal run-time with no garbage collector I guess
GC.free would be replaced by my own memory manager's free function. Does
D allow me to hook my own allocation function into new?
New uses gc_malloc under the hood, override it and you should be fine.
