Walter Bright Wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
> > Another diagnostic feature is to not just use the caret (we have discussed
> > about it time ago) but it also underlines the wrong part:
> >
> > t.c:7:39: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'struct
> > A')
> > return y + func(y ? ((SomeA.X + 40) + SomeA) / 42 + SomeA.X : SomeA.X);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~
>
>
> Yes, we discussed it before. The Digital Mars C/C++ compiler does this, and
> NOBODY CARES.
> Not one person in 25 years has ever even commented on it. Nobody commented on
> its lack in dmd.
> It's a waste of time to implement things nobody cares about.
I think that is a nice feature to have in a compiler. No life-chaging, no
critical, but still nice.
