On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:43 PM, SK <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu > <[email protected]> wrote: >> No Windows? > > My Google-fu shows most complaints related to LLVM on Windows are > actually clang problems. I also came across this, but maybe old news > here: > http://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2009/05/27/why-we-chose-llvm/ >
On further reading, it seems that the reason LLVM is not the focus is answered in the previous thread about gcc 4.6. To paraphrase, the answer is not just lackluster Windows support, but also that Walter has a professional and business interest in advancing back-end compiler technology. Fair enough.
