Sean Kelly Wrote: > I like the way you've done it. It seems like the Obj-C approach is kind of a > sneaky way of implementing function overloading in C. > D supports overloading, so there's no point in creating function names that > include parameter names simply to match the Obj-C definition. > Instead, only the function name is carried through and the rest is dropped > into the parameter list. > It seems like this approach would be easy to automate anyway, and more > readable than the long form.
I strongly agree with Sean, I like the current approach. Paolo
