On 11/7/10 2:40 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 03/11/2010 03:06, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"bearophile"<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Is it correct for immutable struct fields to act like enum or static
const
fields? (I don't think so, but I am wrong often):
immutable struct fields can be changed inside the constructor, so they
must
be non-static.
<snip>
Const/immutable struct members are an ugly mess, and a big hole in the
const system.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
Stewart.
There are problems with the implementation, not the design. Fixing const
and immutable will be #1 priority once the 64-bit dmd is off the gates.
Andrei
