On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 13:28 -0500, Sean Kelly wrote: [ . . . ] > What got me was "if you don't, there are situations that ... may give > the wrong result." I'm fine with eliminating semicolons, but why is > this syntax allowed if it silently produces surprising results? It > seems like a trivial change to require the proper syntax, and not > doing so makes me wonder if there are other such flaws as well.
I understand. I can't say I view the the situation with total happiness. There are situations where the core Go development team stick to what can only be seen as blind prejudice. It has to be said though that this is true of all language developments. I wonder if we need to leave the bike shed? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
