bearophile Wrote: > Kagamin: > > > How do you look at necessary curly braces in Go? Shouldn't they adopt > > python syntax while keeping Go design? > > I like Python syntax, but the features of a language must be all adapted to > each other, they form something like an ecology. > > In general what I look for is a language syntax that is somehow resilient > against simple mistakes that mammals do all the time. So curly braces are > sometimes better than bug-prone alternatives.
Aren't curly braces the same redundancy as semicolons, serving the same purpose?
