Daniel Gibson Wrote: > > I think, it's ok, computers work with nominal time and synchronize with > > world as needed. Hardly you can catch a bug with leap seconds. > > As long as you're not Oracle and your enterprise clusterware crap reboots: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/07/oracle_leap_second/
Synchronization can fail if the code asserts that number of seconds is not greater than 59 (Jonathan's lib does the same, I think). Is it the cause?
