On Friday, November 19, 2010 10:26:40 Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:51:29 -0500, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > On Friday, November 19, 2010 05:54:15 Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:21:20 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I just created a new D Improvement Proposal to fix the toString > >> > >> problem > >> > >> > I brought up several posts ago. > >> > > >> > See: http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP9 > >> > >> I've made suggested changes, please review again. > >> > >> Thanks > > > > The difference between the text and the function signature still exists > > (the text > > says that sink is const scope whereas the signature just says scope), > > Maybe you are confusing sink with sink's parameter, which is marked 'in'? > I reworded the text to make it clearer.
The way I read it was that the delegate was supposed to be scope const, so if that's not the case, the original text wasn't clear enough, bu it's definitely clearer now. - Jonathan M Davis
