On Monday, November 22, 2010 15:29:20 Walter Bright wrote: > Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > The situtation should improve, but it wouldn't surprise me if a lot > > of people pretty much ignored pure at the moment due to problems using > > it. > > I know how to solve the problem, but it's not the top priority at the > moment.
Well, unfortunately, there's plenty of that to go around. Progress is being made though, so that's good. And as far as pure goes, adding weak purity definitely was a big step forward in useability, so while pure definitely has big issues, it's closer to being properly useable. Regardless, I'm definitely looking forward to the 64-bit port. It'll be nice to not need a chrooted environment to get dmd to work properly or Arch Linux (OpenSuSE manages to make it work just fine without a chrooted environemnt, but the Arch guys seem to hate proper multi-lib for some reason...). Your work is definitely appreciated, even if there's plenty more of it which would be nice to have done but isn't yet. - Jonathan M Davis
