On 11/29/10 3:25 PM, Manfred_Nowak wrote:
Daniel Gibson wrote:
"with" shouldn't be much of a problem anymore.
import std.stdio;
struct X{ int a, b, c;}
struct Y{ int a, b;}
void main(){
X x;
Y y;
with( x){
c= 2;
with( y){
c= 1;
}
}
writeln( x.c);
}
Do you see the not "much of a problem"?
-manfred
Great. Could you please submit this as a bug report?
In essence with should work as if this code was written:
with (value) statement
becomes
{
auto field1 = value.field1;
auto field2 = value.field1;
...
auto fieldn = value.fieldn;
statement
}
The rewritten code is not equivalent because the field names are really
references, but they must obey the same visibility rules. If the
rewritten code has any shadowing errors, the use of with should also be
in error.
Andrei
