This came up in discussion and I think the behavior is safe and usable when wanting to change class data in a const function.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.general/43476 One limitation is that value types declared as Mutable (Mutable!(int)) can not be changed if the encapsulating class is declared immutable. For this reason a Mutable value can not be changed inside a const function. I think this is acceptable. Another limitation appears to be an issue with alias this. It is commented as a //FIXME in the code. https://gist.github.com/721066 An example usage looks like: class Inner { int n; } class A { Mutable!(int*) n; Mutable!(int) n2; Mutable!(Inner) innerClass; this() { n = new int; innerClass = new Inner; } void foo( int num ) { n2 = num; } void bar( int num ) const { innerClass.n = num; } } auto aImmu = new immutable(A); auto aMu = new A; int i = 8; *aImmu.n = i, aImmu.bar(6), *aMu.n = i, aMu.n = &i, aMu.n2 = i, aMu.bar(6), aMu.foo(6),
