"Justin Johansson" <nore...@jj.com> wrote in message news:ie5boj$24n...@digitalmars.com... > On 14/12/10 01:20, Daniel Gibson wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Justin Johansson<nore...@jj.com> >> wrote: >>> On 10/12/10 03:33, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>>> >>>> "Ddev"<d...@dprogramming.com> wrote in message >>>> news:idr024$280...@digitalmars.com... >>>>> >>>>> hi community, >>>>> How convince my teacher to go in D ? >>>>> After talk with my teacher, i do not think D is good because after 10 >>>>> years is not become the big one. she is very skeptical about D. If i >>>>> could >>>>> convince my teacher it will be great maybe i will teach to his >>>>> students :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> First of all, 99% of teachers are complete morons, so take any opinions >>>> from >>>> them with a very large grain of salt. >>> >>> Exactly. It is high time 99% of educational institutions fired the 50% >>> of mediocre (and worse) teachers/tutors/lecturers and doubled the salary >>> of >>> the rest of them. >>> >> >> So there are only enough teachers for 50% of the students, who now get a >> better >> education, while the other students don't get an education at all? >> Doesn't sound that great.. > > You are clearly wrong in your conclusion. > My hypothesis is that by attracting better talent for teaching we may > teach for the betterment of all. > How you have extrapolated 50% of students for 50% of teachers if beyond > me.
I think he meant 50% fewer teachers leads to a doubled workload for the remaining teachers. Although if you ask me, most students in school these days *aren't* getting an education anyway, what with incompetent/uninterested/tenured teachers and students that are in college for no reason other than get drunk and kiss enough ass to get the utterly meaningless piece of paper that they're told by the all the mindless zombies they should have. "If you want an education, get a library card." Schools are for drunks with rich parents.
