Brad Roberts wrote:
On 12/13/2010 2:54 PM, Don wrote:I can't really escape the feeling that 'const' guarantees too little. It makes guarantees to the caller, but tells the callee *nothing*.As far as I'm concerned, that's exactly what I want const for. The caller can rely on the object not being modified. Later, Brad
Yes. But the callee wants some guarantees as well. How can we provide them?