None of those usernames are mine except this one (snk_kid). You need to stop making assumptions and nobody really cares about a comment voting system. You come off as a child making such an unprofessional post in a public mailing list of a programming language. Is this what the D community is about? I've never seen anything like it before, its pathetic.
>lurker Wrote: > Why don't you retard, I mean eternium, I mean iLikeCakes, I mean snk_kid, I > mean WeAreAllTreeBear, I mean bearophile's alter ego, go someplace else. > Waisting time here is really not worth it. They provide psychiatric treatment > in hospitals. I can't prove this conspiracy easily, but I also voted down > your stupid remarks there. I hope this teaches you a lesson. > > retard Wrote: > > > Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:56:45 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > > > > > Why do /you/ take it personally? > > > > You've misunderstood. I only wish the discussion was a bit more technical > > and had less to do with opinions and hype. The reason is, a more > > technical approach might solve technical problems in more efficient way. > > But my goal is not to belittle social issues wrt language adoption. > > Surely I understand reddit isn't lambda-the-ultimate.org and I'm glad > > that the Go trolls didn't find the thread (yet). I just find this > > behavior incomprehensible. > > > > My personal stance on this matter is that I believe a more consistent and > > flexible mechanism for operators would fit D. I'm also a bit more of a > > fan of C++0x concepts than those contraints shown in the slides. I > > haven't really thought how it all would work out, but if the atmosphere > > was more ambitious to this direction, I could participate more. But it > > seems my vision conflicts badly with what D2 has become. > > > > > > > > On 12/14/10, retard <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:44:36 -0500, snk_kid wrote: > > >> > > >>> Gary Whatmore Wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Simen kjaeraas Wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > >>>> > >> Compared to the talk at Google, I changed one of the "cool > > >>>> > >> things" from threading to operator overloading. Didn't manage to > > >>>> > >> talk about that - there were a million questions - although I > > >>>> > >> think it's a great topic. > > >>>> > >> http://erdani.com/tdpl/2010-12-08-ACCU.pdf > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > Anyone care to do the honors and post this to reddit programming? > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Done. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/ > > >>>> > > >>>> Guys, I made several sockpuppet reddit accounts to mod down the two > > >>>> guys >criticising this thread. I recommend everyone to help us > > >>>> improve D's publicity by >ignoring these trolls and voting them down. > > >>>> It has worked before, too -- reddit >seems to fold the subthreads > > >>>> that get too many negative votes. This makes it >look much better > > >>>> than it is. > > >>>> > > >>>> - G.W. > > >>> > > >>> That's absolutely pathetic, you're actually doing the community a > > >>> disservice. > > >> > > >> I really don't know what to say. Take a look at > > >> > > >> 0 points: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/c18swbi > > >> > > >> or > > >> > > >> -1 points: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/c18sz8n > > >> > > >> These say nothing against D. Why does one take them personally? They > > >> are both also highly informative. As far as I can tell, these two > > >> comments go much deeper in operator semantics theory than the combined > > >> effort of 68 other threads by Walter, Andrei et al. For example the > > >> precedence of operators can get problematic when using several > > >> libraries from various vendors. > > >> > > >> Then you have: > > >> > > >> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/c18t1d5 > > >> > > >> "I really like D (2.0) and I wish it would take off." > > >> > > >> 7 points? WTF? What is the value of this reply? It's a purely > > >> subjective opinion and doesn't necessarily even beg for further > > >> discussion. > > >> > > >
