"Don" <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. I've just looked through some code that I thought used them > extensively, but found only two complex literals: 1i (dozens of instances) > and 2i (one instance).
So if D removes complex literals what the proposed name for Imaginary One would be? _i , i_ , _i_, _I , I , M_I ?? @i @j looks good to me, I'd like even having them both. Compare code: 0.998f + 2.72e-2fi 0.998f + @i*2.72e-2f 0.998f + 2.72e-2f* @j
