On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:55:18 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:53:15 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -Steve >> >> P. > > Damn, accidentally hit shift-enter which sent the message. > > Meant to write: > > P.S. is there a better adjective for 'immutable or implicitly > convertable to immutable'? That's a lot of verbiage for something > that's really needed in a lot of places in the spec.
Value type? That is, a real value type, not one that is really a reference in disguise. "Pure value type", perhaps? -Lars
