Andrei: > I'm thinking what to do about iota, which has good features but exacts > too much cost on tight loop performance. One solution would be to define > iota to be the simple, forward range that I defined as Iota2 in my > previous post. Then, we need a different name for the full-fledged iota > (random-access, has known length, iterates through the same numbers > forward and backward etc). Ideas?
Is improving the compiler instead an option? Bye, bearophile
