On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 21:13:05 +0100 Don <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but OCaML isn't a C-family language, inheriting C's broken > treatment of literals.
Just for information (I really mean information, not starting a new discussion): was it proposed to let down such legacy mess form C at the time when D1-->D2 was designed? I know one of D's principles is that idioms that look like C code should have C's semantics (my words). But a major verson change... Denis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com
