On 31.12.2010 11:35, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 30.12.2010 22:59, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky:
On 28.12.2010 16:08, Daniel Gibson wrote:
[snip]
## UnbufferedInputTransport:

I'd like "void readFully(ubyte[] buffer)" which reads buffer.length
bytes or throws an exception if that is not possible
This would also fix busy-waiting (it'd block until buffer.length bytes
are available).

Also "size_t read(void* buffer, size_t length)" (and the same for
readFully()) would be nice, so one can read from the stream to buffers
of arbitrary type without too much casting. Is probably especially
handy when used with (data from) extern(C) functions and such.

Also, for convenience: "ubyte[] read(size_t length)" (does something
like "return read(new ubyte[length]);"
and "ubyte[] readFully(size_t length)"

This, I guess, would be provided by free functions in the same module,
there is no point in requiring to implement them inside the stream itself.

Maybe for the convenience functions, but what about readFully()?
Could the stream not support a non-blocking read that reads up-to buffer.length bytes and a blocking read that blocks until buffer.length bytes are read?

I meant something like this (assuming call  to t.read blocks):
//reads exactly buf.length bytes, not counting some extra that might reside in the internal buffer ubyte[] readFully(BufferedInputTransport t, ubyte[] buf) //changed signatures to prevent allocations
auto dst = buf[];
while(!dst.empty){
    auto res = t.read(dst, dst.length);
    dst = dst[res.length..$];
}
return buf;
}
Also that would be pig slow without buffering. The internal implementation of BufferedTransport may use non-blocking IO to keep reasonable buffer fill rate.
If you want to read whole ints, floats, shorts, ... you need something like that anyway, because only one byte of an int doesn't help you at all. But because the stream may support something like this natively, it makes sense to have readFully() here and not in Unformatter.



## UnbufferedOutputTransport:

I'd like "void write(void *buffer, size_t length)" - for the same
reason as read(void* buffer, size_t length).

Ditto


Cheers,
- Daniel
--
Dmitry Olshansky

Reply via email to