Walter Bright wrote: > Jonathan M Davis wrote: >> On and Off would be much better, but I suspect that it's one of those >> things where they chose symbols instead so that they didn't have to worry >> about internationalization. That way, it confuses _everyone_ instead of >> just non- English speakers. ;) > > I suspect as much, too, but at least "on" and "off" can be looked up in a > dictionary. There's no hope for O and |.
I always assumed they meant 0 and 1. Then it's easy, just put it in an if() statement :)
