Daniel Gibson napisał: > "restricted to n log(n)"? I think you meant just "log(n)" > > As far as I remember the last discussion, it was considered to allow it for > arrays of a constant size or with known (at compiletime) contents or > something > like that. > But then again, that would feel kind of inconsistent (syntax is allowed for > fixed size arrays but not for dynamic arrays).
If it's about compile-time, it can be done with template wizardry: x in [1, 5, 7] -> x.in_!(1, 5, 7) -- Tomek
