On 01/31/2011 11:10 AM, %u wrote:
Hi,I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed because it's dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of the same dangling reference problem, how come int[] global_var; void foo(int[] args...) { global_var = args; } isn't considered to be just as dangerous, and therefore also being removed? (Or perhaps this is a bug, and we should always add the scope modifier so that it prevents reference escaping?) Thanks! :)
IIRC, I had a bug because of this, precisely (except for obj.member instead of global_var).
Denis -- _________________ vita es estrany spir.wikidot.com
