"Jonathan M Davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > So, please make any last comments or suggestions on this proposal, and > vote on > whether you think that assertPred should be in Phobos (assuming that > assert > isn't going to be improved such that assertPred isn't necessary) and > whether you > think that assertThrown, assertNotThrown, and collectExceptionMsg should > get in > regardless of whether assertPred does. >
I'm in favor of all of them. Sure, maybe we could do better than assertPred, but when's that actually going to happen? In the meantime, assertPred is a hell of an improvement over the current state and it exists *now*. I don't want to needlessly hijack the present just for the sake of some still-hypothetical future.
