"Jacob Carlborg" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 2011-02-13 23:38, spir wrote: >> On 02/13/2011 10:35 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> "spir"<[email protected]> wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>>> >>>> Also, I really miss a D for D lexical- syntactic- semantic- analyser >>>> that >>>> would produce D data structures. This would open the door hoards of >>>> projects, including tool chain elements, meta-studies on D, >>>> improvements >>>> of these basic tools (efficiency, semantis analysis), decelopment of >>>> back-ends (including studies on compiler optimisation specific to D's >>>> semantics), etc. >>>> Even more important, the whole cummunity, which is imo rather >>>> high-level, >>>> would be able to take part to such challenges, in their favorite >>>> language. >>>> Isn't is ironic D depends so much on C++, while many programmers come >>>> to D >>>> fed up with this language, presicely? >>>> >>> >>> DDMD: http://www.dsource.org/projects/ddmd >> >> Definitely a good thing, and more! :-) Thank your for the pointer, Nick. >> I will skim across the project as soon as I have some hours free. And >> see if --with my very limited competence in the domain-- I can >> contribute in any way. >> I have an idea for a side-feature if I can understand the produced AST: >> generate Types as D data structures on request (--meta), write them into >> a plain D module to be imported on need. A major aspect, I guess, of the >> 'meta' namespace discussed on this list. >> >> Denis > > Currently it doesn't compile on Posix, and never has as far as I know. > That's one thing you can help with if you want to. Don't know the status > on Windows >
It compiles fine on Windows. Some of the last few commits were related to compling on Linux and OSX. Does the latest version still not work?
