"Walter Bright" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > I hear stuff about how dmc should catch up with LLVM and do modern things > like data flow analysis, yet dmc has done data flow analysis since 1985. I > also hear that dmc should do named return value optimization, not > realizing that dmc *invented* named return value optimization and has done > it since 1991. These claims are clearly made simply based on assumptions > and reading the marketing literature of other compilers. >
If it isn't already, maybe all this should be mentioned on the D site.
