Re: the naked keyword is an attribute - but it looks like an function when used?

[Denis Koroskin]

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:45:21 +0300, dennis luehring <dl.so...@gmx.net>  
wrote:

naked INSIDE of the context which is adress with the attribute - looks  
very strange to me, because it changes the pro- AND epilog of an  
function/codeblock

real blabla(real x)
{
   asm{
     naked;
     mov EAX,[RSP];
     naked;
     add EAX,0x3fff;
     naked;
   }
}

wouldn't it be better to have something like

naked asm{
...
}

or

real blabla(real x) naked
{
   naked asm{
   }
}

or like delphi does

real blabla( x: real ) assembler
{
   mov EAX,[RSP];
   add EAX,0x3fff;
}

Yes, naked applied to the whole function body, and I proposed to make it  
an external attribute because of that:

http://www.mail-archive.com/digitalmars-d@puremagic.com/msg22593.html