On 23/02/2011 17:22, Nick wrote:
On 2/23/2011 12:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei
Thanks for all your replies!
I was not sure about mixins: the template ones had a little warning in
the book as being mostly experimental, and the string mixins, while
powerful, seemed to me something closer to c++ macros than to the
template/class/policies I knew. But I will look again.
I will start slowly and defer to this list if I get stuck.
Thanks!
D is sufficiently close to C++ that I was able to port (most of) the
classic version of boost::spirit to D in a month of my spare time.
Spirit makes rather enthusiastic use of template meta programming;
though not half as much as the new version.
Most of that time was spent groking spirit rather than actually doing
the D implementation as well.
--
My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness.
http://www.ssTk.co.uk
