On 03/05/2011 05:32 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:14:44 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Lars T. Kyllingstad"<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
As mentioned in the "std.path.getName(): Screwy by design?" thread, I
started working on a rewrite of std.path a long time ago, but I got
sidetracked by other things. The recent discussion got me working on
it again, and it turned out there wasn't that much left to be done.
So here it is, please comment:
http://kyllingen.net/code/ltk/doc/path.html
https://github.com/kyllingstad/ltk/blob/master/ltk/path.d
I don't want to jinx it, but there seems to be a lot of agreement in
this thread. Seriously, how often does that happen around here? :)
Not too often, so I take it as a good sign that I'm onto something. ;)
The only disagreement seems to be about the naming, so let's have a round
of voting. Here are a few alternatives for each function. Please say
which ones you prefer.
* dirSeparator, dirSep, sep
dirSep
* currentDirSymbol, currentDirSym, curDirSymbol
currentDirSymbol
* basename, baseName, filename, fileName
baseName, fileName
* dirname, dirName, directory, getDir, getDirName
dirName, getDirName
* drivename, driveName, drive, getDrive, getDriveName
driveName, getDriveName
* extension, ext, getExt, getExtension
* stripExtension, stripExt
(The same convention will be used for stripExtension, replaceExtension
and defaultExtension.)
don't mind
About "xyz" vs "xyzName": the point is what is denoted /is/ a name. It's not a
programming object modelling a directory or a drive.
-Lars
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
