On 03/06/2011 04:27 PM, foobar wrote:
Are there other concerns?
>
> I think that every individual variable, function and type in Phobos should
> use the naming convention of whatever random language the author happened to
> be thinking of when they wrote it. That way Phobos won't seem messy. Plus,
> the lack of any sensible rules would make it super-easy to remember all the
> different spellings, punctuations and capitalizations.
>
>
>
I would also add to the above excellent point that in order to prevent unworthy
people of programming in the holly D programming language we must require every
D programmer to be fluent in English, Latin and Greek (including cultural
references to movies and such), have *at least* expert Unix hacking
credentials, have a certified MSFT engineering diploma, be Guru level
programmers in all of the following: c, c++, Haskell, Perl, APL, LISP, ALGOL
and COBOL.
AND, lest we forget, they must code ONLY in a terminal based text-editor with
80 character wide lines.
Thus, if I understand correctly, the D community finally let down all
prerequisites in fields of mathematical logics, philosophy of language, and
metaphysics of automata? Or what?
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
