On 10/03/2011 00:30, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 16:23:15 Nebster wrote:
On 09/03/2011 06:55, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/8/2011 1:23 PM, Trass3r wrote:
Yes, but you can compile an x64 dmd yourself on Linux.
Is there any "how to"?
IIRC you have to edit linux.mak to use -m64 instead of -m32.
It has worked in the past, but the 64 bit build is not regularly tested.
Does the toolchain compile on windows in 64 bit too?
It's awesome you're finally starting the transition :)
No. Regardless of whether you could build dmd itself as 64-bit (which is
questionable), the linker is only 32-bit, and since it's written in assembly,
you _definitely_ can't compile that as 64-bit. So, you don't have 64-bit on
Windows - either the dmd binary or the binaries that it produces. And honestly,
Path: digitalmars.com!not-for-mail
From: Sean Kelly<[email protected]>
Newsgroups: digitalmars.D
Subject: Re: If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:17:17 -0700
Organization: Digital Mars
Lines: 5
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
References:<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: digitaldaemon.com 1152303437 51022 216.127.61.99 (7 Jul 2006 20:17:17
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:17:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
In-Reply-To:<[email protected]>
Xref: digitalmars.com digitalmars.D:39708
Walter Bright wrote:
Not for 1.0.
Thanks :-)
Hehe, thanks for the response. I know about the linker but I was looking
into the new version of UniLink which has support for D now afaik!
It's not that much of a problem for me at the moment anyway :)
Thanks,
Nebster
