On Monday 14 March 2011 02:24:45 Jonas Drewsen wrote: > On 14/03/11 00.07, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Sunday 13 March 2011 14:56:34 Jonas Drewsen wrote: > >> On 13/03/11 18.29, dsimcha wrote: > >>> One of the features I miss most in Phobos is support for SQLite. > >>> Several people have written bindings and wrappers and haven't gotten > >>> much attention. (For example: https://github.com/bayun/SQLite3-D ). > >>> > >>> IMHO, we should do the following: > >>> > >>> 1. Put SQLite bindings and the C code (which is public domain) in > >>> etc.c, just like zlib now. Put it in the docs, etc. to make sure > >>> people know it's there. This will lower the barrier to entry for > >>> people who want to make wrappers. These can probably be included > >>> without any review, since they're a pile of well-tested C code and a > >>> fairly mechanical translation of a header file. > >>> > >>> 2. Encourage people to make wrappers **after** the C code and bindings > >>> are already "just there", ready to be used. With the barrier to entry > >>> lowered, we might actually get someone who's serious enough about it to > >>> take it through the whole review process, etc., rather than just > >>> dumping a quick n' dirty post to the forum and then forgetting about > >>> it. > >> > >> It's a great idea. But I think there need to be some kind of janitor for > >> the 'etc' modules so that it does not end up as a new dsource collection > >> of many unmaintained, some dead and a few live projects. > >> > >> Btw. are there any kind of automated nightly builds of dmd/phobos to > >> handle regressions? > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/ > > > > - Jonathan M Davis > > Very nice. Is this you own build setup or an official one?
No. That's the official autotester. Brad Roberts manages it. It's expanded quite a bit recently. FreeBSD and OSX are _very_ recent, and 64-bit Linux is fairly recent. - Jonathan M Davis
