On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:32:43 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/15/11, dsimcha <[email protected]> wrote:
Something that has basically that effect is allowed, just not with that
syntax:
struct slist_node(T)
{
slist_node base;
alias base this;
T data;
}
Shouldn't base be a pointer? You'll get errors with that code.
The problem is the name. The original code had a simple un-parameterized
slist_node type:
struct slist_node
{
slist_node * next;
}
So when David wrote his response, he meant *that* struct. However, the
way he named his parameterized struct, it actually refers to itself.
This is the one I wrote, which should be what the OP wanted:
struct slist_node_t(T)
{
slist_node base;
alias base this;
T data;
}
-Steve
