== Quote from Jonathan M Davis ([email protected])'s article > The fancier stuff would be nice, but we don't even have a doubly-linked list > yet. We should get the simpler stuff sorted out before we get particularly > fancy, not to mention that it's usually the simple stuff that gets heavily > used.
For the most part I agree, but a doubly linked list might be **too** simple. Linked lists are so trivial to implement that I'd tend to roll my own that does exactly what I need with regard additional behavior on insertion, etc. rather than wrapping a library solution to get these features.
