David
You are not the only one to find __traits ugly – although not directly
related to your question, it has been proposed several times to ditch
is(typeof()) and __traits and replace them with a magic »meta«
namespace. There is even a bug report about it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3702
- __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? Ary Manzana
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? David Nadlinger
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? Ary Manzana
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? Nick Sabalausky
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? KennyTM~
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? Alix Pexton
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about ::? KennyTM~
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what about... Ary Manzana
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what ... bearophile
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, w... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, w... bearophile
- Re: __traits so long and ugly, what ... KennyTM~
