On 04/03/2011 07:19 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
KennyTM~ wrote:
Talking of asm, would the following be expected to work?
Maybe. Part of me says "yes, it should be the same as a literal*"
but part of me says no because it's weird to drop a template in
an asm block.
* For example:
enum a = octal!777;
asm {
mov EAX, a;
}
does indeed work.
But, all in all, I don't think octal! itself in asm should work.
It's not literally a literal.
The whole is that, precisely, it is not (no more) a literal. Octals have no
more syntactic existence ;-)
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
