On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 08:50 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: [ . . . ] > I agree with everyone who says octal!x is good enough -- nobody uses octal > except for unix permissions, so anyone who's arguing against the syntax is > doing it from a theoretical position, since it probably doesn't affect > them.
Not entirely true, but views have been aired, decisions ratified, so it is time to move on with the status quo -- probably "Whatever You Want", but maybe "What You're Proposing" -- mostly thought this is now a non-issue, is there anything else to be said? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part