On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 08:50 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I agree with everyone who says octal!x is good enough -- nobody uses octal  
> except for unix permissions, so anyone who's arguing against the syntax is  
> doing it from a theoretical position, since it probably doesn't affect  
> them.

Not entirely true, but views have been aired, decisions ratified, so it
is time to move on with the status quo -- probably "Whatever You Want",
but maybe "What You're Proposing" -- mostly thought this is now a
non-issue, is there anything else to be said?

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to